I still watch them on the computer I just no longer record them there. Instead of scheduling and recording all of my shows with my tuners I download the shows as bit torrents from the web. The shows tend to be available the day after they aired, they are high quality and the commercials have been cut out of them.
Another advantage of downloading verses recording the shows is that the download file tends to be about a quarter the size of the recorded show. I freed up nearly a terabyte of space on my Windows Home Server by downloading all of the back episodes and deleting my recordings for my series.
To find bit torrents of your favorite shows you can use torrent search engines or you can use Google. There is a great guide to setting up your Windows Media Center environment and downloading your shows called Eliminate Cable available from AssassinHTPC. There were a couple of ideas listed in this guide that I've started using.
Friday, February 10, 2012
My Home Video System is working super well, I am thrilled
For video playback I now use a computer at each television. These computers connect to my Windows Home Server to pull or stream video. The neat thing about this setup is that I can start watching a movie on one computer, stop the playback, move to the other computer and resume watching at the spot I stopped.
I'm not doing anything special to make this room to room move work, I'm just using one source for all of my video and Windows Media Center (which is in all versions of Windows 7 except basic). Windows Media Center (also known as WMC) writes a little file to the location where the video file is located noting where you stopped playback.
Last night we were watching Jungle Book 2 in the front room. Stopped the movie, moved upstairs to get ready for bed and continued playback. The cable company wants to charge quite a bit for a DVR that can do this and Windows can do it for free.
I'm not doing anything special to make this room to room move work, I'm just using one source for all of my video and Windows Media Center (which is in all versions of Windows 7 except basic). Windows Media Center (also known as WMC) writes a little file to the location where the video file is located noting where you stopped playback.
Last night we were watching Jungle Book 2 in the front room. Stopped the movie, moved upstairs to get ready for bed and continued playback. The cable company wants to charge quite a bit for a DVR that can do this and Windows can do it for free.
Wednesday, December 28, 2011
Just added a cable card tuner to my Media Center setup
I bought the Hauppauge WinTV DCR-2650 Dual Tuner Cable Card TV Tuner from Amazon. The installation was fairly simple although I did have to call Time Warner and work with them for about half an hour to get it registered on their system.
The cable card feature on this allows it to work like the DVR that I rent from Time Warner. I can see the encrypted channels that my Silicon Dust HD HomeRun cannot see. It is not perfect however as many channels are broadcast on an on demand basis, the technology for this is called Switched Digital Video or SDV. SDV is used for the channels that have few viewers, unfortunately for me BBC HD is included in that list. To get the SDV channels your tuner needs to send a signal to Time Warner to send the channel. The Hauppauge cannot send the signal but it does work with a tuning adapter to notify Time Warner that you want to watch an SDV channel.
I picked up a tuning adapter from Time Warner, there was not cost, unfortunately the one I got is not currently supported by Hauppauge so I am still out some channels.
The picture on my HD channels is great, just as good as my DVR if not better. I am really enjoying this new cablecard tuner setup. I do wish that this was a network device like the HD HomeRun so that I could share the tuners on multiple computers. Silicon Dust makes a new version of the HD HomeRun that is cablecard and network capable, the cost has kept me from buying it so far.
More details soon.
The cable card feature on this allows it to work like the DVR that I rent from Time Warner. I can see the encrypted channels that my Silicon Dust HD HomeRun cannot see. It is not perfect however as many channels are broadcast on an on demand basis, the technology for this is called Switched Digital Video or SDV. SDV is used for the channels that have few viewers, unfortunately for me BBC HD is included in that list. To get the SDV channels your tuner needs to send a signal to Time Warner to send the channel. The Hauppauge cannot send the signal but it does work with a tuning adapter to notify Time Warner that you want to watch an SDV channel.
I picked up a tuning adapter from Time Warner, there was not cost, unfortunately the one I got is not currently supported by Hauppauge so I am still out some channels.
The picture on my HD channels is great, just as good as my DVR if not better. I am really enjoying this new cablecard tuner setup. I do wish that this was a network device like the HD HomeRun so that I could share the tuners on multiple computers. Silicon Dust makes a new version of the HD HomeRun that is cablecard and network capable, the cost has kept me from buying it so far.
More details soon.
Friday, March 11, 2011
Silicon Dust HDHomeRun
For Christmas I bought myself an HDHomerun. This is a network connected dual tuner that works with many software products including Windows Media Center.
The HDHomerun is ethernet attached and as many computers as you like can use it to tune in and watch or record digital television. With two tuners two computers can each use one tuner or one computer could use both tuners at the same time.
The HDHomerun has required quite a bit of configuration but nothing technical. I've had to configure many of the digital cable channels but Silicon Dust offers great instructions and tech support to help in this process.
One of the issues that I have with the HDHomerun is that once you do all your configs for the channels you have to repeat them for every computer. I wish there was some way to move the config file from one computer to another.
Over all I am very happy with the HDHomerun and would recommend it to someone who is not afraid of some configuration work.
The HDHomerun is ethernet attached and as many computers as you like can use it to tune in and watch or record digital television. With two tuners two computers can each use one tuner or one computer could use both tuners at the same time.
The HDHomerun has required quite a bit of configuration but nothing technical. I've had to configure many of the digital cable channels but Silicon Dust offers great instructions and tech support to help in this process.
One of the issues that I have with the HDHomerun is that once you do all your configs for the channels you have to repeat them for every computer. I wish there was some way to move the config file from one computer to another.
Over all I am very happy with the HDHomerun and would recommend it to someone who is not afraid of some configuration work.
Back on Media Center Again
We moved the DVR back to the family room and I've setup a Media Center PC in our bedroom. While I'm not loving the selection of channels, many of our favorites are not available, we are loving watching downloaded video and some Media Center recorded shows.
I've installed the Silicon Dust HDHomerun and so far am pleased with it. It's been fun to work with and configure to get all the channels possible. I still don't quite have it setup completely but am probably 95% done.
Part of the issue that I have with my Media Center is that I don't want to leave the computer in the bedroom running all the time. I have a computer in my office that runs 7X24. I configure recordings from the HDHomerun on the office computer and then daily I power up the bedroom computer and move the recordings over.
The issue that comes up with this setup is that if I see a commercial for a show that I want to record I have to either try to remember it and schedule it when I get on the office computer or run to the office and schedule it right away. Remote access to the office computer would be cumbersome as it's awkward to use a wireless keyboard while sitting in bed ten feet from the television screen.
Media Center is not the perfect solution that I would like it to be but it's pretty good and I'm having fun playing with it.
I've installed the Silicon Dust HDHomerun and so far am pleased with it. It's been fun to work with and configure to get all the channels possible. I still don't quite have it setup completely but am probably 95% done.
Part of the issue that I have with my Media Center is that I don't want to leave the computer in the bedroom running all the time. I have a computer in my office that runs 7X24. I configure recordings from the HDHomerun on the office computer and then daily I power up the bedroom computer and move the recordings over.
The issue that comes up with this setup is that if I see a commercial for a show that I want to record I have to either try to remember it and schedule it when I get on the office computer or run to the office and schedule it right away. Remote access to the office computer would be cumbersome as it's awkward to use a wireless keyboard while sitting in bed ten feet from the television screen.
Media Center is not the perfect solution that I would like it to be but it's pretty good and I'm having fun playing with it.
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
I want an e-reader
The amount of reading that I do has dropped significantly lately. At least the number of novels that I read has dropped. I still read a ton of websites, blogs, rss feeds, and car magazines but I don't get around to my novels. I've been working on reading The Atlantis Code for over a month now.
I think there are several reasons why my recreational reading has dropped off. First, I read a ton of material on the web all day long. Second, I'm busy working and taking care of things at home. When I finally get some down time I either veg in front of the television or sleep. The best chance for me to read a novel is in bed just before sleep.
I wonder if I would read more if I had an e-reader. Would making reading more convenient lead to more reading? I’d hate to go out and buy an e-book reader and then find out that I don’t read any more than I did with paperbacks but I am a tech hound and am dying to buy one.
There are several e-readers currently available, what differentiates them tends to be the size of the screen and the web access they provide. Here is a list of the e-readers I’m currently looking at:
My dream e-reader would be a tablet computer with instant on, wi-fi and/or 3G internet access, a full color screen and a full qwerty keyboard like the Kindle has. All of this for $259 would be ideal. Perhaps the next Kindle will have a color screen.
If I can’t get my dream system then I want a basic e-reader. Basic means it opens and reads many types of files, works great. It would have no wireless access at all and no keyboard. Just a basic reader and I want to pay about $100 for it.
If I had my choice of any of these e-readers, cost not being an issue I’d go with the Sony Daily Edition. I like the size and format of the screen and the device looks great. That being said I’ve hinted heavily that I’d like a Kindle, we’ll see if I get one for x-mas, I doubt it and kind of don’t want it as I’d like to wait and see what is coming next. If I do get one I’ll write up my experience with it and whether I am reading more or not.
I think there are several reasons why my recreational reading has dropped off. First, I read a ton of material on the web all day long. Second, I'm busy working and taking care of things at home. When I finally get some down time I either veg in front of the television or sleep. The best chance for me to read a novel is in bed just before sleep.
I wonder if I would read more if I had an e-reader. Would making reading more convenient lead to more reading? I’d hate to go out and buy an e-book reader and then find out that I don’t read any more than I did with paperbacks but I am a tech hound and am dying to buy one.
There are several e-readers currently available, what differentiates them tends to be the size of the screen and the web access they provide. Here is a list of the e-readers I’m currently looking at:
| name | cost | screen size | screen resolution | color screen | wireless access | browser | size | weight in oz. |
| Amazon Kindle | $259 | 6" | 600 X 800 | 16 shades of grey | 3G | yes | 8" x 5.3" x 0.36" | 10.2 |
| Amazon Kindle DX | $489 | 9.7" | 1200 X 824 | 16 shades of grey | 3G | yes | 10.4" x 7.2" x 0.38" | 18.9 |
| Barnes & Noble Nook | $259 | 6" | 16 shades of grey with color touchscreen | 3G and Wi-Fi | ?? | 7.7"4.9"X.5" | 11.2 | |
| Sony Daily Edition | $399.99 | 7" | 600 X 1024 | 16 shades of grey | 3G | ?? | 5"X8.2"X.6" | 12.75 |
| Sony Touch Edition | $299.99 | 6" | 800 X 600 | 8 shades of grey | ?? | ?? | 6.9"X4.8"X.4" | 10.1 |
| Sony Pocket Edition | $199.99 | 5" | 800 X 600 | 8 shades of grey | ?? | ?? | 6.25"x4.25" x.4" | 7.76 |
| ECTACO jetBook | $179 | 5" | 6.02" x 4.33" x 0.51" | 7.5 |
My dream e-reader would be a tablet computer with instant on, wi-fi and/or 3G internet access, a full color screen and a full qwerty keyboard like the Kindle has. All of this for $259 would be ideal. Perhaps the next Kindle will have a color screen.
If I can’t get my dream system then I want a basic e-reader. Basic means it opens and reads many types of files, works great. It would have no wireless access at all and no keyboard. Just a basic reader and I want to pay about $100 for it.
If I had my choice of any of these e-readers, cost not being an issue I’d go with the Sony Daily Edition. I like the size and format of the screen and the device looks great. That being said I’ve hinted heavily that I’d like a Kindle, we’ll see if I get one for x-mas, I doubt it and kind of don’t want it as I’d like to wait and see what is coming next. If I do get one I’ll write up my experience with it and whether I am reading more or not.
Monday, April 13, 2009
I hate losing pictures
I hate losing pictures, I've been taking digital pictures for almost as long as you have and I hate losing them. I can't readily locate the pictures from my honeymoon ten years ago. It would be a terrible loss if I never find those pictures again. To help ensure that I never lose another picture I employ a variety of backup systems.
Systems and services that I am going to discuss in this post:
Jungledisk from jungledisk.com
Amazon S3 from aws.amazon.com/s3/
Windows Home Server from microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/windowshomeserver
Disclaimer:
I do not work for or own any of the companies that I am discussing today. I use the products but that is the only relationship I have with these companies.
To backup my pictures I bought the jungledisk program, it cost a one time fee of $15. This program is used to access Amazon S3 to use as a storage system. Jungledisk maps a local drive letter to Amazon S3 on each computer that I have it loaded. Amazon S3 stores my data.
I have Jungledisk configured to nightly backup my pictures folder on my main computer to Amazon S3. I don't backup all of my data, just the pictures folder. Only changed or new files are moved up to Amazon S3 so the upload is usually small and fast.
I get billed by Amazon for my S3 useage monthly, most of my bills are between $.17 and $.27 for the month. I played around and moved several gigabytes of data through S3 last month and my bill was an eye watering $1. something. Not too bad for storing all of my pictures.
I also use Amazon S3 to help me move files and data between work and home. If there is something I don't want to forget I'll upload (drag and drop into the jungledisk drive) the files to S3 and then download them at home. Speeds are as fast as your network connection and the storage is resonably price.
In the past couple of months I've added a Windows Home Server (WHS) to my network. I use the WHS to backup all of my PCs in my home and sometimes to share files between systems. Microsoft offers a six month free trial of WHS and so far that's what I've been using.
I took an old PC that I wasn't going to use again, added some hard drives and loaded WHS on it. Over the period of the last couple of months I've migrated the data off of the old smaller hard drives I'd initially set it up with onto two new terabyte sized drives. The migration of drives is handled by WHS and was very easy to do.
Most of the time I leave my WHS server off, I tend to turn it on over the weekends to let it get a current backup of my workstations. I'd leave it on all of the time but I don't want to burn the electricity for the server when I'm not using it.
WHS supports add-ins to help with the administration of the server and to add capabilities. One of the add-ins that I've installed is the Jungledisk add-in. Because I am already a Jungledisk user this add-in was free. I have Jungledisk scheduled to backup my WHS server to my Amazon S3 storage on a weekly basis.
So, to recap my backups:
1) Jungledisk backs up the pictures on my main PC
2) WHS backs up all of my PCs to it's drives
3) Jungledisk backs up WHS
I'm getting multiple backups of my data, 1 on my WHS and 2 copies on Amazon S3. Eventually I'll clean this up so that I am only getting two backups, the local WHS and the remote Amazon S3, but for the mean time Amazon S3 storage is cheap so I don't mind the duplication.
Systems and services that I am going to discuss in this post:
Jungledisk from jungledisk.com
Amazon S3 from aws.amazon.com/s3/
Windows Home Server from microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/windowshomeserver
Disclaimer:
I do not work for or own any of the companies that I am discussing today. I use the products but that is the only relationship I have with these companies.
To backup my pictures I bought the jungledisk program, it cost a one time fee of $15. This program is used to access Amazon S3 to use as a storage system. Jungledisk maps a local drive letter to Amazon S3 on each computer that I have it loaded. Amazon S3 stores my data.
I have Jungledisk configured to nightly backup my pictures folder on my main computer to Amazon S3. I don't backup all of my data, just the pictures folder. Only changed or new files are moved up to Amazon S3 so the upload is usually small and fast.
I get billed by Amazon for my S3 useage monthly, most of my bills are between $.17 and $.27 for the month. I played around and moved several gigabytes of data through S3 last month and my bill was an eye watering $1. something. Not too bad for storing all of my pictures.
I also use Amazon S3 to help me move files and data between work and home. If there is something I don't want to forget I'll upload (drag and drop into the jungledisk drive) the files to S3 and then download them at home. Speeds are as fast as your network connection and the storage is resonably price.
In the past couple of months I've added a Windows Home Server (WHS) to my network. I use the WHS to backup all of my PCs in my home and sometimes to share files between systems. Microsoft offers a six month free trial of WHS and so far that's what I've been using.
I took an old PC that I wasn't going to use again, added some hard drives and loaded WHS on it. Over the period of the last couple of months I've migrated the data off of the old smaller hard drives I'd initially set it up with onto two new terabyte sized drives. The migration of drives is handled by WHS and was very easy to do.
Most of the time I leave my WHS server off, I tend to turn it on over the weekends to let it get a current backup of my workstations. I'd leave it on all of the time but I don't want to burn the electricity for the server when I'm not using it.
WHS supports add-ins to help with the administration of the server and to add capabilities. One of the add-ins that I've installed is the Jungledisk add-in. Because I am already a Jungledisk user this add-in was free. I have Jungledisk scheduled to backup my WHS server to my Amazon S3 storage on a weekly basis.
So, to recap my backups:
1) Jungledisk backs up the pictures on my main PC
2) WHS backs up all of my PCs to it's drives
3) Jungledisk backs up WHS
I'm getting multiple backups of my data, 1 on my WHS and 2 copies on Amazon S3. Eventually I'll clean this up so that I am only getting two backups, the local WHS and the remote Amazon S3, but for the mean time Amazon S3 storage is cheap so I don't mind the duplication.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)